518: Daniel Kahneman | When Noise Destroys Our Best of Choices

Topics covered
Popular Clips
Questions from this episode
- Asked by 146 people
- Asked by 117 people
- Asked by 37 people
- Asked by 36 people
- Asked by 35 people
- Asked by 32 people
- Asked by 25 people
- Asked by 24 people
- Asked by 21 people
- Asked by 6 people
Episode Highlights
Judicial Noise
Judicial decision-making is fraught with variability, or "noise," which can lead to inconsistent outcomes. explains that judges' decisions can be influenced by factors as trivial as their mood or hunger, leading to significant disparities in sentencing 1. This noise is distinct from bias, which is a consistent deviation in judgment. Kahneman uses the analogy of measuring a line with a fine ruler to illustrate noise: "The measurements in principle should be identical, but they vary. That's noise" 2. Algorithms, while not immune to bias, offer a noise-free alternative, though societal bias against them persists due to a preference for human judgment 3.
Medical Algorithms
In medical decision-making, the potential of algorithms to outperform human judgment is significant. Kahneman notes that algorithms can reduce errors in decisions like granting bail, where human judges often falter due to noise 4. Despite their advantages, there is a strong bias against algorithms, as people prefer human intuition even when it is less reliable. Kahneman advises caution when dealing with tired doctors, as fatigue introduces noise into their decisions: "When they are very tired, they make poor decisions. And that's noise" 5. This highlights the need for consistent, noise-free algorithmic input in critical areas like medicine.
Algorithmic Bias
The biases inherent in algorithmic systems and public perception challenges are complex issues. Kahneman acknowledges that algorithms can be biased, often reflecting the biases of their creators, yet they remain noise-free 3. Public resistance to algorithms stems from a preference for natural over artificial solutions, as seen in the discomfort with self-driving cars or AI diagnostics. Kahneman explains, "We define noise as variability that you don't want," contrasting it with beneficial variability in evolution 6. This distinction underscores the need to address both bias and noise in algorithmic decision-making.
Related Episodes


417: Dan Ariely | The Hidden Logic That Shapes Our Motivations
Answers 383 questions

63: Daniel Pink | When Is the Best Time to Get Things Done?
Answers 383 questions

378: Steven Johnson | How We Make the Decisions That Matter the Most
Answers 383 questions

662: Daniel J. Levitin | How to Think Critically in the Post-Truth Era
Answers 383 questions

1079: Noise Pollution | Skeptical Sunday
Answers 383 questions

40: Annie Duke | How to Make Decisions Like a Poker Champ
Answers 383 questions

903: Dan Ariely | Why Rational People Believe Irrational Things
Answers 383 questions

482: Adam Grant | The Power of Knowing What You Don't Know
Answers 383 questions

1147: Daniel J. Levitin | The Science Behind Music as Medicine
Answers 383 questions

232: Daniel Goleman | A Logical Look at Emotional Intelligence
Answers 383 questions

522: Daniel Pink | To Sell Is Human
Answers 383 questions

757: Annie Duke | The Power of Knowing When to Quit
Answers 383 questions
887: Andy Clark | How Our Minds Predict and Shape Reality
Answers 383 questions

27: David Eagleman | How Your Brain Makes Sense of the World
Answers 383 questions

414: Jonah Berger | How to Change Anyone's Mind
Answers 383 questions
