736: Ian Bremmer | The Power of Crisis to Change the World

Topics covered
Popular Clips
Questions from this episode
- Asked by 108 people
- Asked by 31 people
- Asked by 24 people
- Asked by 21 people
- Asked by 12 people
Episode Highlights
Cyber Warfare
Cyber warfare represents a significant shift in global power dynamics, as traditional military capabilities become less relevant. explains that cyber weapons are difficult to detect and control, making them a potent tool in international conflicts 1. The interdependence of major economies like the US and China creates a form of mutually assured destruction, deterring preemptive cyber attacks. However, Bremmer warns of the potential for cyber capabilities to fall into the hands of radicals, posing a threat to global stability 2.
The US and the Chinese have a mutual interest in ensuring that offensive cyber capabilities do not proliferate into the hands of radicals around the world.
---
This lack of cooperation on cyber threats highlights the urgent need for international collaboration to prevent catastrophic outcomes.
Quantum Computing
Quantum computing poses a unique challenge to global security, with the potential to disrupt cryptographic systems and alter power balances. and Ian discuss the risks associated with quantum breakthroughs, which could lead to preemptive military actions if one nation gains a significant advantage 3. The technology's exclusivity currently limits its proliferation, but the rapid development of other disruptive technologies like AI and autonomous drones presents a more immediate threat.
The danger of, say, quantum computing, is that a level of breakthrough that a lot of people believe will come within a decade.
---
Addressing these challenges requires proactive international policies to monitor and control the spread of such technologies.
Technological Leadership
In a multipolar world, technological leadership is fragmented, with different regions leading in various sectors. Ian highlights that while the US plays a crucial role in military support, leadership in areas like climate policy and global trade is more distributed 4. The European Union, for example, is at the forefront of setting environmental standards, while the US lacks a cohesive trade policy.
It doesn't mean that you can't get leadership, but the leadership will be much more messy and it'll be much more differentiated depending on what we're talking.
---
This complexity reflects a world where power is no longer concentrated in a single nation, but rather shared among various actors depending on the issue at hand.
Related Episodes


880: Ian Bremmer | Dealing with a World In Disarray
Answers 383 questions

2: Rob Weinhold | The Art of Crisis Leadership
Answers 383 questions

640: Peter Zeihan | Why the World Should Care About Ukraine
Answers 383 questions

781: Peter Zeihan | Mapping the Collapse of Globalization
Answers 383 questions

410: H.R. McMaster | The Fight to Defend the Free World
Answers 383 questions

473: Scott Galloway | From Crisis to Opportunity Post Corona
Answers 383 questions

972: Mustafa Suleyman | Navigating The 21st Century's Greatest Dilemma
Answers 383 questions

650: Brian Klaas | The Corruptible Influence of Power
Answers 383 questions

848: Yuval Noah Harari | Peering into the Future of Humanity
Answers 383 questions

341: Julie Gerberding | Answering Your COVID-19 Questions
Answers 383 questions

859: Bradley Schurman | Demographic Collapse in Russia, China and the USA
Answers 383 questions

888: Marc Andreessen | Exploring the Power, Peril, and Potential of AI
Answers 383 questions

654: Chris Miller & Brandon Wheeler | News from Ukraine's Warfront
Answers 383 questions

1117: Anne Applebaum | Inside The Fortune 500 of Modern Dictatorships
Answers 383 questions

1134: Ukraine 2025 | Out of the Loop
Answers 383 questions
