544: Psycho Scammer Landlord Alert | Feedback Friday

Topics covered
Popular Clips
Questions from this episode
- Asked by 141 people
- Asked by 113 people
- Asked by 81 people
- Asked by 25 people
- Asked by 25 people
- Asked by 22 people
- Asked by 15 people
- Asked by 14 people
- Asked by 13 people
- Asked by 7 people
- Asked by 5 people
- Asked by 2 people
Episode Highlights
Defamation
and tackle the complexities of defamation law, particularly in the context of exposing a dangerous landlord. Jordan explains that a statement about a private individual is defamatory if it is false, made recklessly or negligently, and causes harm. He emphasizes that true statements, especially those backed by public records, cannot be defamatory 1. Gabriel adds that secondhand allegations fall into a gray zone and advises corroborating sources to avoid recklessness 2.
You can write about this guy's criminal record to your heart's content, because that is a public record. You're not revealing anything new.
---
They stress the importance of precise language to avoid legal pitfalls, such as differentiating between arrests and convictions.
Exposing Risks
Discussing the risks of exposing a dangerous individual, Jordan and Gabriel weigh the pros and cons of writing an article about a violent landlord. Jordan acknowledges the potential danger, noting that confronting such a person could lead to retaliation 3. He advises using the legal system to hold the landlord accountable while minimizing personal risk. Gabriel suggests working with a legitimate publication to ensure legal protection and thorough vetting of the story 4.
You publish the article, you might find yourself staring at this dude's knife in an Albertson's parking lot one day or something.
---
They recommend consulting with an attorney and possibly partnering with an experienced journalist to navigate the complexities safely.
Career Moves
The conversation shifts to career advice, specifically about job hopping in the legal field. Gabriel reads a listener's dilemma about returning to a previous employer after a short stint at a new firm. Jordan reassures the listener that moving back to Firm A is a sound decision if it offers more fulfillment and stability 5. He emphasizes that a single job switch does not constitute a negative pattern and advises focusing on long-term career satisfaction 6.
Go where you're wanted, go where the work is interesting. The team is solid. The pay is good. Don't sweat the timeline too much.
---
They highlight the importance of evaluating job opportunities based on personal and professional growth rather than the fear of being labeled a job hopper.
Related Episodes


675: A Tenant, Psychotic, Makes Your Life Chaotic | Feedback Friday
Answers 383 questions

642: Living In Fear of the Fiend Who Lurks Near | Feedback Friday
Answers 383 questions

355: My Roommate Tried to Kill Me! | Feedback Friday
Answers 383 questions

609: Evicting a Boarder with a Dangerous Disorder | Feedback Friday
Answers 383 questions

152: How to Cope with a Schizophrenic Neighbor | Feedback Friday
Answers 383 questions

923: She's Losing Sleep Over a Dangerous Creep | Feedback Friday
Answers 383 questions

796: Pervert-in-Law Scammer Belongs in the Slammer | Feedback Friday
Answers 383 questions

517: Trouble Runs Deep with the Neighborhood Creep | Feedback Friday
Answers 383 questions

857: Forever on the Lam from a Blackmailing Scam? | Feedback Friday
Answers 383 questions

454: Dodging Criminal Liability For Erotic Roleplaying | Feedback Friday
Answers 383 questions

227: How to Communicate with Stinkers and Deadbeats | Feedback Friday
Answers 383 questions

391: Help! My Ex Hacked My Entire Home! | Feedback Friday
Answers 383 questions

508: Shaking an Unsuitable Stalking Suitor | Feedback Friday
Answers 383 questions

505: Special Needs Son Seduced by Psycho Siren | Feedback Friday
Answers 383 questions

785: Living with Aplomb in Spite of a Monstrous Mom | Feedback Friday
Answers 383 questions
