Is astrology scientifically valid?

Astrology is not considered scientifically valid. Jordan Harbinger discusses that astrology lacks a basis in scientific scrutiny and is fundamentally different from the principles of science. For instance, astrology emerged before modern scientific methods and doesn't conform to scientific standards of repeatability and empirical evidenceh14.

Astrology fails two crucial tests for scientific validation: a plausible mechanism and statistical significance. First, there is no known physical mechanism by which celestial bodies could exert significant influence on human lives. The stars and planets do not have the necessary gravitational or electromagnetic impact at such vast distances to affect individuals on Earth[h23]("12).

Additionally, empirical investigations show that astrology's predictions do not hold up under statistical analysis. When tested objectively, astrology's claims do not perform better than chancechunk_142972.

The scientific community, including astrophysicists who study celestial objects, unanimously dismisses astrology due to its lack of scientific underpinning. If there were any validity, these scientists would be actively researching it, but they are noth20.

Overall, the consensus is that astrology remains a belief system without scientific credibility or empirical support[34").